Skip to main content

The Asian Currency Crisis of 1997 - Lessons for Nigeria

In the spring of 1997, Thailand spent billions in defending its currency (the Thai Baht) against speculative attacks, finally capitulating and devaluing the Baht in July 1997. This triggered moves throughout the region to defend currencies against speculators.

Ultimately, these efforts were not successful and many countries abandoned the effort and allowed their currencies to float freely.

The Philippines, Indonesia, and South Korea abandoned their pegs against the US dollar.

The currency crisis resulted in each of these four countries having negative GDP growth in 1998, as follows:


  • Thailand (-7.63%)
  • Philippines (-0.58%)
  • Indonesia (-13.13%)
  • South Korea (-5.47%)


By the following year (1999), all of these countries experienced positive GDP growth, and in the 10 years that followed (2000 to 2009) average GDP growth rates were as follows:


  • Thailand (4.32%)
  • Philippines (4.46%)
  • Indonesia (5.11%)
  • South Korea (4.68%)


Granted, the average GDP growth rates before 1997 (1987 to 1996) for these countries, excluding The Philippines, were slightly higher than the growth rates in the 2000's. However, this could simply be because these countries have gradually moved up the ladder in terms of development - As a country becomes more developed, they start to have less room for growth.

For example, Germany (a developed economy) had an average GDP growth rate of 1.67% between 1987 and 2009, whereas Nigeria and China (both developing economies) averaged 4.88% and 10.02%, respectively, during the same period, with Nigeria having two dictators and at least one military coup d'état during that period.

Closer to home, Egypt devalued its currency and allowed a free float in 2016, and has mostly seen positive results from this action, including:


  • having a stable currency
  • preserving its foreign reserves and deployment of its cash toward developing its economy
  • higher GDP growth in each of the two years that followed the devaluation than in the five years (average) before the devaluation.


Will allowing the Naira float / exchange rates determined by market participants really harm the Nigerian economy as many have been made to believe?

As i said in this article, the best time for the Buhari administration to devalue the Naira was during the 2015 oil crash and the recession that followed. The next best time is NOW.

Don’t let a good crisis go to waste (for the second time in a row)!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Armed robbery in broad daylight: a government of the people and by the people, literally

In an address by Nigeria’s president, Muhammadu Buhari, on April 13 th , he communicated the decision to extend the lockdown in Lagos, Ogun and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, for another period of two weeks, due to the Coronavirus. He also stated that pallative measures had been approved and delivered to 2.6 million households, and that these pallatives will be sustained, with another 1 million households included in the scheme during the next two weeks. As has been seen all over the world, shutdowns such as we currently have in Nigeria come at great costs to the economy, and the President has demonstrated exemplary leadership by extending the lockdown, despite the short-term costs to the economy. Of course, an alternative course of action would result in consequences of catastrophic proportions. Unfortunately, making the right decision does not always result in good outcomes. The tendency for good decisions to lead to terrible outcomes is even greater when the decisio

Investing during a global recession: How to position your finances during and after the COVID-19 crisis

Investing during periods of uncertainty can be more complicated than investing during almost any other phase of the business cycle, particularly from a behavioural / emotional perspective. It can be especially painful for investors who already had a sizable portfolio at the peak of the cycle, and who may have to watch significant and swift declines in their overall portfolio and net worth – at least before the recovery begins. I have received a lot of requests and questions regarding investing during and after the COVID-19 crisis and I will share my thoughts on some of the most common questions below. Before I proceed, I must say that my thoughts here do not constitute financial or investment advice and should not be taken as such. I would also like to add that I started the Smart Investing with Nosa Podcast (available on YouTube , Spoitfy and Apple Podcasts ) at the beginning of 2020 with the goal of simplifying investment principles and bringing practical insights to these

Preserving vitality and sanity amidst all of the COVID-19 negativity

"Where there's life, there's hope". These words, famously echoed by Stephen Hawking, have never been more apt than in the situation we currently find ourselves in. The world is going through one of the worst crisis in modern history - healthcare, economic, political, etc., all happening at the same time, and it is difficult to predict when things will get back to normal, if things will ever get back to normal or what the new normal would be. There is an overwhelming amount of information that is being circulated across various media platforms. The substance of the information overload ranges from the educative, to the humorous. However, a significant amount of the information that comes to the mainstream are about negative occurrences around the world. A lot of negativity is being passed around in the form of news and statistics. While it is important to stay informed about what is going on around the world, it is also important to recognise the impact that all