Skip to main content

The Asian Currency Crisis of 1997 - Lessons for Nigeria

In the spring of 1997, Thailand spent billions in defending its currency (the Thai Baht) against speculative attacks, finally capitulating and devaluing the Baht in July 1997. This triggered moves throughout the region to defend currencies against speculators.

Ultimately, these efforts were not successful and many countries abandoned the effort and allowed their currencies to float freely.

The Philippines, Indonesia, and South Korea abandoned their pegs against the US dollar.

The currency crisis resulted in each of these four countries having negative GDP growth in 1998, as follows:


  • Thailand (-7.63%)
  • Philippines (-0.58%)
  • Indonesia (-13.13%)
  • South Korea (-5.47%)


By the following year (1999), all of these countries experienced positive GDP growth, and in the 10 years that followed (2000 to 2009) average GDP growth rates were as follows:


  • Thailand (4.32%)
  • Philippines (4.46%)
  • Indonesia (5.11%)
  • South Korea (4.68%)


Granted, the average GDP growth rates before 1997 (1987 to 1996) for these countries, excluding The Philippines, were slightly higher than the growth rates in the 2000's. However, this could simply be because these countries have gradually moved up the ladder in terms of development - As a country becomes more developed, they start to have less room for growth.

For example, Germany (a developed economy) had an average GDP growth rate of 1.67% between 1987 and 2009, whereas Nigeria and China (both developing economies) averaged 4.88% and 10.02%, respectively, during the same period, with Nigeria having two dictators and at least one military coup d'état during that period.

Closer to home, Egypt devalued its currency and allowed a free float in 2016, and has mostly seen positive results from this action, including:


  • having a stable currency
  • preserving its foreign reserves and deployment of its cash toward developing its economy
  • higher GDP growth in each of the two years that followed the devaluation than in the five years (average) before the devaluation.


Will allowing the Naira float / exchange rates determined by market participants really harm the Nigerian economy as many have been made to believe?

As i said in this article, the best time for the Buhari administration to devalue the Naira was during the 2015 oil crash and the recession that followed. The next best time is NOW.

Don’t let a good crisis go to waste (for the second time in a row)!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Preserving vitality and sanity amidst all of the COVID-19 negativity

"Where there's life, there's hope". These words, famously echoed by Stephen Hawking, have never been more apt than in the situation we currently find ourselves in. The world is going through one of the worst crisis in modern history - healthcare, economic, political, etc., all happening at the same time, and it is difficult to predict when things will get back to normal, if things will ever get back to normal or what the new normal would be. There is an overwhelming amount of information that is being circulated across various media platforms. The substance of the information overload ranges from the educative, to the humorous. However, a significant amount of the information that comes to the mainstream are about negative occurrences around the world. A lot of negativity is being passed around in the form of news and statistics. While it is important to stay informed about what is going on around the world, it is also important to recognise the impact that all ...

Between a rock and a hard place – hunger or the Coronavirus?

With over 1.4 million cases and 82 thousand deaths, as at 7 th April 2020, the Coronavirus pandemic has sent shock waves across the world and shows no signs of stopping soon. Projections and estimates about the extent of the outbreak are a dime a dozen, but one thing that most projections appear to agree on is that by the time the virus is contained or a vaccine is made available to the public, most people would have had an infected relative or would know someone personally, who was infected. The grim projection is largely due to the rate at which the Virus spreads and the long incubation period, which leads to many asymptomatic patients ( silent carriers ) being able to spread the Virus even before they become aware of their own infection. For comparison, the 1918 flu pandemic ( Spanish flu ), with a similar mode of transmission, infected around 500 million people (about 25% of the world’s population at the time), killing between 17 million and 100 million people, over a three ...